Hi, On Tuesday 26 January 2016 19:50:13 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Reminds me a bit of https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125530/ :-)
Uh, damn, I missed this :-( I guess the intention is the same. KXmlGui is pretty important to have a "KDE Application" but it pulls in so much dependencies that it's imho a bit against the Frameworks Idea. And the demand for this should be obvious if two maintainers of large KDE- Windows deployments independently write such Patches ;-) I would go so far as basically forking it (maintaining patches as part of gpg4win) to avoid the DBus / KService dependency. Let's see if my patches fare better. ConfigWidgets and IconThemes i find ok. :-) Regards, Andre P.S. I have not figured out how to create reviewrequests that depend on a revision under review so you have to look at the phabricator link for the other (similar) patches. -- Andre Heinecke | ++49-541-335083-262 | http://www.intevation.de/ Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998 Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
