On Saturday, January 23, 2016 11:59:28 AM CET David Faure wrote: > On Thursday 14 January 2016 13:20:01 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I want to suggest to move polkit-qt-1 [1] from kdesupport to frameworks. > > Reasons are: > > > > * kdesupport is basically what became tier1 in frameworks > > * it's used by other frameworks, e.g. KAuth (tier 2) and in > > kde/workspace > > * polkit-qt-1 is currently in a not really released state (last release > > in 2014, quite a few bugfixes around) > > > > By moving it to frameworks we get closer to getting rid of kdesupport > > and get the making releases problem solved once and for all: bug fixes > > will get to users in a timely manner. > > > > Opinions? > > Sounds good. A few questions come to mind: > > - Will you be the official maintainer? (Otherwise who will?)
eh no, my domain knowledge is not enough and I already maintain too much. My suggestion for maintainer is shared responsibility of Plasma team. Not optimal, but still better than the unmaintained state it's currently in. And Plasma needs polkit. > > - Is this an opportunity for a better name? I keep wondering why this lib > targets Qt 1 :-) The name makes kind of sense. It's a Qt wrapper for polkit-1. If you have a better name suggestion: sure, but it shouldn't cause breakage for existing code. Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
