> On Nov. 6, 2015, 12:25 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote:
> > I'd remove the code, instead of just commenting it out if it's really not 
> > needed.
> > 
> > Also, minor nitpick: QList<T*> is pretty much equivalent to QVector<T*>, 
> > you won't see any big difference, performance or memory wise. That said, 
> > I'm all for using QVector everywhere by default. It's certainly not worse 
> > than QList ;-)
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Oh and maybe wait for a review of David before pushing this. I have no clue 
> > about the code itself. The patch looks fine from my POV though.

above should read:

...`QList<T*>` is pretty much equivalent to `QVector<T*>`...


- Milian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125971/#review88094
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 5, 2015, 11:55 p.m., Nick Shaforostoff wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125971/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 5, 2015, 11:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Laurent Montel.
> 
> 
> Repository: karchive
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> i couldn't find the place where the pointers contained in the member arrays 
> are deleted so i have added their releasing. for this i have used qDeleteAll 
> (you can search for qDeleteAll in the diff)
> 
> also i have reordered members of FileInfo to reduce its 'sizeof'
> also using qvector for storing pointers is as fast as using qlist (or even 
> faster) and needs less memory
> also i have switched qvector acces from operator[] to .at() because it is 
> const (doesn't call detach() method internally)
> also i have disabled the code that was filling 'method' string because it was 
> not used anywhere after
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/k7zip.cpp 321620a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125971/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> compiles fine
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nick Shaforostoff
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to