Hi David, 2015-09-28 23:21 GMT+03:00 David Faure <fa...@kde.org>: > Naming: "experimental" sounds like "it will be a framework at some point, > when it > stabilizes". Maybe we should say "internal" either, i.e. used internally by > apps > and workspace, don't use outside of that. Which still doesn't prevent a > framework > tagged "internal" from turning a proper public framework later. > > Maybe the "experimental" or "internal" should even be part of the tarball name > and distro package names, to make really sure app developers see that.
Sounds good, I'm only worried about users/developers disregarding these libraries because they have "experimental" in their names, even though they may have been around and work OK for 5+ years already. We still need some distinct naming scheme/namespace for kf5-experimental, right? -- Alexander Potashev _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
