Hi, >> I am already quiet annoyed to see we actually can turn on X11 on Mac, Qt's >> own >> X11 backend is not available >> per default anyway, which sense makes that? > > Qt's X11 backend builds just fine except for a few details that should be easy > enough to address. > > Choice is good but if it annoys you, just look the other way (and do it > quietly, > as you already suggested by accident :P). I do the same with dogma. > (Or get yourself a Winbox, it's a bit harder to "turn on X11" there...) you are aware that with this we introduce just a extra platform we will get bugs for? We then not have just Mac/Qt but also Mac/Qt-X11 which is not even officially supported by Qt itself?
To tell me to look the other way is nice, but won't stop the bugs from coming to our bugtracker. In the dependency thread the concern was raised for bugs that will come in if we make more stuff optional, but X11 on Mac is just a complete different level of potential support problems. Btw., if you like to have a second opinion read Boudewijn mail from that thead: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2015-October/027673.html I fully agree with him. Greetings Christoph -- ----------------------------- Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann --------- AbsInt Angewandte Informatik GmbH Email: cullm...@absint.com Science Park 1 Tel: +49-681-38360-22 66123 Saarbrücken Fax: +49-681-38360-20 GERMANY WWW: http://www.AbsInt.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Christian Ferdinand Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Saarbrücken, HRB 11234 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
