On Monday, August 24, 2015 2:48:14 PM CEST David Faure wrote: > On Monday 24 August 2015 13:04:24 Milian Wolff wrote: > > [QK]LockFile was too unreliable on linux > > That sounds like judging QLockFile based on how badly KLockFile worked :) > > IOW, it doesn't sound like you actually tried Qt5's QLockFile. > > Anyhow, if DBus works, DBus works. I just wanted to avoid FUD being spread > about my nice fully-unittested QLockFile, which has very little to do > code-wise with KLockFile :)
Yes, sorry. This was all tested in KDE 4 times, and probably QLockFile wasn't even around back then? Sorry about the FUD, please assume I wrote KLockFile 4 above. Cheers -- Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de http://milianw.de _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
