El Divendres, 31 de juliol de 2015, a les 20:57:37, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:14 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Friday 31 July 2015 04:25:53 no-re...@kde.org wrote: > >> GENERAL INFO > >> > >> BUILD FAILURE > >> Build URL: > >> https://build.kde.org/job/kiconthemes%20master%20kf5-minimum/PLATFORM=Li > >> nux,compiler=gcc/1/>> > > rsync: change_dir > > "/srv/jenkins/install/ubuntu/x86_64/g++//kf5-minimum/kdesupport/extra-cm > > ake-modules/inst" failed: No such file or directory (2)> > > Hi Scarlett, > > is there a way to disable all notifications until CI is repaired? (I > > assume these errors are a consequence of the disk full situation). > > > > Otherwise people will learn to just ignore the CI failure emails, which is > > bad for the long run.... > This is because extra-cmake-modules hasn't been built, which is > because qt5 for k5-minimum hasn't been built (and I don't see a job > for it because it is currently set to a tag, which I suspect the code > does not support).
It does support tags, it's just not building because it needs the patch i sent to this list the other day to build, Scarlett told me she'd have a look at how to make the build include that patch but i guess she hasn't had time yet. > > Building Qt is becoming a huge too hard basket job these days. I've > copied stable-kf5-qt5's Qt over to kf5-minimum (which has suddenly > decided to start building itself...) to resolve this issue. This means > kf5-minimum isn't really that, but it'll shut the CI system up at > least. > > Can we please bump the required version of Qt for Frameworks to > something which is buildable without needing patches? The first branch that builds with such a newer glib as the one we're using is Qt 5.4 and I guess that is unacceptable from the KDE Frameworks point of view. Cheers, Albert > > We're going to have to drastically rethink how we structure the CI > system, due to the extremely differing requirements of various parts > of KDE which wasn't really the case in the past. What Frameworks wants > and what everyone else wants just differs way too much. Doesn't help > that Qt doesn't keep itself buildable on modern OSes... > > > Thanks! > > Cheers, > Ben > > > -- > > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
