On Friday, May 08, 2015 10:32:22 Christian Mollekopf wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2015, at 05:38 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: ... > > The versioning would be a complete mess: each framework having > > a > > different version number, some doing bug fix releases, some don't. > > ...that "complete mess" is just actual versioning instead of a timestamp > that is applied to everything. > > To me "frameworks" is on one side a the umbrella term for all > frameworks, and on the other hand a distribution of kde-related libraries. > What it seems to be treated as largely is one gigantic library > consisting of 62 submodules, which is IMO a shame since so much work has > been put into splitting these modules up, and making these libraries > reusable by third parties. > So I don't really understand why we now have to continue treating all > libaries within frameworks as something special instead of just like any > other library out there.
So +1 ... ... > Appart from the communcation aspect, we make library updates > unnecessarily risky because of > the complete frameworks dependency tree getting pulled in (so you have > to pull in 8 updates instead of 1), > which is probably the biggest problem in an enterprise environment. Same here, +1 Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
