On Monday 16 March 2015 23:16:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > We have KPackage depending on kdoctools but since it's optional we pretend > it's not a real dependency and call KPackage tier2 > > What's in it for us other than lying to ourselves? What's so bad about > KPackage being tier 3? > > It'd still have only 3 dependencies and be totally usable, no?
Maybe it needs to document both: * without optional packages it's tier 2 * with optional packages it's tier 3 I can imagine that this will be interesting for more frameworks where it could be that depending on which platform we run on it's a different tier (kglobalaccel is currently tier 1 for non-X11, but tier3 on X11). Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
