> On March 1, 2015, 7:09 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Ah. kiod registers as kssld5, but if it's not running then this doesn't 
> > work indeed.
> > 
> > We could install a .service file for kssld but ok, let's do this for now. 
> > My idea of making this independent from the process actually hosting kssld 
> > is more trouble than I thought.

I don't have commit access, so would be nice if someone else could submit this 
change


- Bartosz


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122606/#review76823
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 1, 2015, 3:29 a.m., Bartosz Sławianowski wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122606/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 1, 2015, 3:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kio
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KSslCertificateManager is trying to connect to org.kde.kssld5 directly which 
> doesn't work because it lacks it's own .service dbus file needed for 
> start-on-demand.
> 
> This patch makes it connect correctly to org.kde.kiod5 (which then loads 
> kssld5 module and makes service available) instead.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core/ksslcertificatemanager.cpp a47ca68 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122606/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> KIO git with patch, tested with Konversation which used to spam SSL errors 
> before applying patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bartosz Sławianowski
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to