On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:01 AM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > > Bottom line: since there's the possibility of a non-xapian backend making > > Baloo effectively LGPL and not effectively GPL, I'd be in favor of > waiting > > for it to be reality. > > We need a much shorter term solution than that, for practical purposes.
Currently Baloo is installed under the KF5 prefix, so if we decide to not put it as part of Frameworks, we either need to rename all the libraries and update all the programs using Baloo. As a compromise, I can start releasing Baloo independently every month until it is effectively LGPL. But it can still remain a psuedo framework since it will follow the framework versioning and the KF5 prefix. Though it really is more work. -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
