On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Monday, December 15, 2014 19:48:30 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > If we make Baloo GPL and then happen to change the database > > > used we would have to relicense all of Baloo. That would be a lot > > > of admin work contacting all developers. > > > > I'm not advocating changing the library headers to GPL*, just not saying > > the library is LGPL, when it can not be *used* as an LGPL library. > > Ow, maybe I haven't made myself clear. Let's try again: > > - If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework > > - Even if headers are marked as LGPL, it should be very clear that the > effective license at this stage is GPL > > > So what Ivan says. :) +1
Cheers, Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
