-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119740/#review64403
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Code seems to be fine, seems to be working on Denis's machine, awesome work! :D

- Rohan Garg


On Aug. 13, 2014, 12:51 a.m., Denis Steckelmacher wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119740/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 12:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kapidox
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The README.md file of each framework repeats information like the mailing 
> list or the git repository of the framework. This patch extends kapidox so 
> that this information is extracted automatically from the metadata.yaml file 
> and displayed in the menu bar of the apidox website. The information is 
> displayed there because the menu is built using Jinja templates (easy to 
> change and powerful) and because this place is always visible.
> 
> Here is the information shown:
> 
> * A link to inqlude
> * Maintainer (if the "maintainer" key of metadata.yaml does not contain an at 
> symbol, then "@kde.org" is appended). A module having no maintainer is said 
> to be maintained by "The KDE Community"
> * Basic dependencies. The idea is to highlight the fact that Tier 1 
> frameworks depend only on Qt (and possibly other non-framework libraries). A 
> list of real dependencies is not yet available but there are tools for that 
> that may one day become available.
> * Supported platforms
> * Community links (mailing list, IRC channel and projects.kde.org page)
> * Code snippet showing how to use the framework with CMake
> * Code snippet showing how to use the framework with QMake (so that Qt-only 
> users feel at home)
> * A "git clone" snippet
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/kapidox/data/templates/fwinfo.html PRE-CREATION 
>   src/kapidox/generator.py 203586e 
>   src/kgenframeworksapidox fbc03c1 
>   src/kapidox/data/htmlresource/kde.css 0ecdf57 
>   src/kapidox/data/templates/doxygen.html b7463c0 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119740/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've built the documentation of all the frameworks and the code runs. The 
> information is correct in all case except the CMake and QMake library names 
> of some frameworks. This comes from the fact that this information is not 
> directly available in metadata.yaml and needs to be guessed. Problems arise 
> when a framework does not follow the ususual K<name> or <name> naming scheme 
> (for instance, KArchive is KF5::Archive, but KDED is not KF5::DED). This can 
> be solved by adding a key in metadata.yaml:
> 
> cmakename: KDED
> 
> Some changes are also needed when a framework installs several libraries 
> (SonnetCore and SonnetUi for instance). This can be fixed using this key:
> 
> libraries: [SonnetCore, SonnetUi]
> 
> There may still be names that are not correct. Ideally, there should not be 
> any guessing at all and all the metadata.yaml should provide a CMake 
> configuration name, a list of CMake libraries and a list of QMake libraries. 
> This information can be found in the CMakeLists.txt file and I'm okay with 
> updating the metadata.yaml file of all the frameworks if you want.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Denis Steckelmacher
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to