-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/#review62556
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks good to me. Please grep for more uses of LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR in other 
frameworks though, they might have the same issue?

- David Faure


On July 16, 2014, 7:29 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 16, 2014, 7:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdesu
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This resolves the problem of passing relative vs. absolute 
> KF5_LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR/LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR.
> ATM kdesu does not even work due to that (suprocess.cpp change)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/client.cpp f207122 
>   src/config-kdesu.h.cmake 992503d 
>   src/kdesud/CMakeLists.txt 45b6aa2 
>   src/suprocess.cpp 5c30f65 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> builds, and kdesu works
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to