> On July 13, 2014, 11:20 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > Which version of Qt are you using? On which OS, with which compiler? > > > > (I think the issue is Qt 5.2 vs 5.3, let's see...) > > Andreas Xavier wrote: > Thank you for the quick response. > > I am using Fedora 20, linux 3.14.9, gcc 4.8.3, and Qt 5.2. > > So I take it that if I compile Qt5.3 from source QBasicAtomicInt has the > implicit constructors to/from int?
Yes. However, we advertise Qt 5.2 compatibility, so this patch should actually go in. I just wanted to make sure this was the issue. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/#review62246 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 13, 2014, 4:11 p.m., Andreas Xavier wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 13, 2014, 4:11 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson. > > > Repository: kconfig > > > Description > ------- > > While building frameworks following > https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Building/Details, > I was unable to compile kconfig because QBasicAtomicInt is being treated as > an int. This patch fixes that problem. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/core/kconfig.cpp 14a5d39 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Compiled successfully. > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Xavier > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
