On 19/06/14 00:32, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org > <mailto:bcooks...@kde.org>> wrote:
> Note though that I consider this a workaround for an upstream > regression which we have detected. > One of the reasons the CI system runs the next branch is to detect > such regressions before they end up in a release and impact us. > Well, we need to make sure that we're using the cmake version that is > useful for KDE developers, not for cmake. > > At the moment, the situation we are in is not acceptable where CI in > general is totally unreliable.Furthermore, it's quite unlikely that > we'll get to depend on 3.1 anytime soon, especially given that we're not > requiring 3.0. It's not a question of depending on 3.1. It's a matter of people using 3.1 when they compile frameworks. For example, I use ArchLinux and so tend to have the latest released version of a given piece of software. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
