On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Andreas Cord-Landwehr <cordlandw...@kde.org > wrote:
> Hi, I just noticed that Kross is marked as "porting aid" in KF5. Since I > am pondering to use Kross for a Qt5/KF5 app, I wonder if that would be a > future-proof decision. > > Is there a technical reason (like a successor or a competing framework) > why it got to the porting aids? Or is it simply the reason that there is no > maintainer? And in any case, would it be wise to use Kross (I need both > Python and JavaScript interfaces)? > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > > The reason to move it there was, AFAIR, the fact that there's nobody who knows how to push the project forward or even take small decisions on it. The decision can be probably revised, but I wouldn't adopt it only from a consumer point of view. Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
