> On May 5, 2014, 7:17 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: > > IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on kdoctools.
Hrm. Distros like Debian aren't going to be super-happy about this. And KJS is officially a porting aid, so I'm not sure bumping it to tier 3 is that big of an issue (especially since the practical dependencies are still minimal). - Alex ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/#review57287 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 4, 2014, 7:21 a.m., Burkhard Lück wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 4, 2014, 7:21 a.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. > > > Repository: kjs > > > Description > ------- > > add missing man page docbook, which got lost in the transition from kdelibs > to frameworks > > > Diffs > ----- > > CMakeLists.txt 60ee824 > docs/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION > docs/kjs/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION > docs/kjs/man-kjs5.1.docbook PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > build + installed, viewed with "man kjs5" > > > Thanks, > > Burkhard Lück > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
