On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Alex Merry <alex.me...@kde.org> wrote: > There are currently four frameworks that are yellow (for between 6 hours and 8 > days). kdelibs4support has had 3 commits (not counting those by scripty) since > it broke that have done nothing to fix the issue. > > If we claim that our release schedule means more stability because of our > review process and CI system, we need to enforce it. How are we going to do > this? Because I don't think our current system is working very well. 8 days is > a long time for breakage to stick around when we release every month. > > I don't think Jenkins currently sends emails directly to people who appear to > have broken something - can we make it do so? Do we want to?
I'd prefer we not enable this option, as otherwise sysadmin will receive emails for every unstable build once scripty has committed to the repository. The Jenkins option for this emails *everyone* who has committed to the repository since the test breakage has occurred. > > Do we want to have a "fix it or have it reverted" policy? How would that > interact with failures that can only be reproduced on Jenkins (which does have > an unusual setup)? > > Alex Thanks, Ben > > > (PS: I would try to fix things, but I don't have access to my development > machine this weekend) > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
