Am 13.05.25 um 17:22 schrieb Volker Krause:
On Montag, 12. Mai 2025 11:26:41 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Sune Vuorela
wrote:
On 2025-05-11, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
Please work on fixing them, otherwise I will remove the failing CI jobs on
their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
multiple reasons.
Bad news: 1 repository is still failing
krunner - 2ND WEEK
* https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/krunner/-/pipelines/944055
* reuse fails
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/krunner/-/commit/55d6f117fc9279e202ce08ed5
b73c64ea3f261ae
It is this one pushed without CI that broke it.
It is not hard to fix is one knows how Nicolas intends to license those
files?
And as said on Matrix already, this isn't limited to KRunner, we'd ideally get
the missing SPDX markers added to the qdoc files in all of KF, as those are
likely going to be copy/pasted to more repos (including REUSE-compliant ones).
That raises the question of what license do we want them to have?
Our Licensing Policy says "Documentation must be licensed under the
CC-BY-SA-4.0 or compatible licence". Does a qdocconf file qualify as
documentation (it only contains configuration, no actual documentation
words)? Probably close enough.
