Hello, On Monday 24 February 2014 02:49:45 Aleix Pol wrote: > I would say that we should follow however it's done in Qt. So far we've > been trying to provide as much of a similar experience as if it was another > Qt module. Doing so here as well could be interesting too. > > The changes you propose make sense too, even on a linux system (although > I'm unaware of how this PUBLIC_HEADER property works), so I wouldn't have a > big problem to adopt them.
I agree with all the above. > What scares me the most is that things will break over time from people > only testing on Linux, though. This could become frustrating, but also a > huge step forward for the project. Not a good reason to not do it though. At the end of the day we'll need the CI to provide windows and mac builds somehow... until then yes it'll be more painful than necessary on those platforms. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
