I can do the changes if needed. It just needs the changes here: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes under "Build System" ? I believe attica currently builds with both qt4 or qt5 based on cmake options (if QT4_BUILD is set it builds with qt4). Is the qt4 branch supposed to not use ECM then?
BR, Jeremy On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:47 AM, <frede...@gladhorn.de> wrote: > On Tuesday 4. February 2014 23.40.22 David Faure wrote: >> On Monday 03 February 2014 11:34:44 Kevin Ottens wrote: >> > On Monday 03 February 2014 10:17:49 David Faure wrote: >> > > Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1? >> > > >> > > Should I include attica? >> > >> > Since this question keeps popping up, let's integrate it. It should also >> > be >> > added to the list: http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List >> >> Yes, but see what I wrote in the "Tier status of attica & kwallet" thread: >> there's some buildsystem work to be done for attica to be a proper > framework >> (making it use ECM, so it can integrate better with the other frameworks >> and be fully consistent with them, including installing camelcase >> forwarding headers etc.), which also means moving the qt4 support into a >> separate branch first. >> Which brings us to the next topic: who as maintainer should approve this. >> >> > Also, since no one stepped up to say if it should be in or out, I'd > say it >> > should be with no declared maintainer until someone claims it. >> >> I was under the impression that it had a maintainer, although right now I >> can't remember if that was Jeremy Whiting or Frederik Gladhorn or someone >> else. Cc'ing them. Guys, any input? >> >> (Note that overall this would lower the future maintainance work on > attica's >> buildsystem, since it will just be maintained together with the other >> frameworks, by anyone who makes changes to ECM or across all frameworks.) > > I won't realistically get around to make any improvements and I have no > idea about ECM, so I'd be very happy if someone could take over these > tasks. > > I had the impression that Laszlo worked with attica for a while, but I > don't know if he's available for any of this porting work. > From my point of view, please just go ahead and change it as you think is > sensible. > > Greetings, > Frederik > > _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
