On 02/02/14 16:10, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On 02/02/2014 04:54 PM, Alex Merry wrote: >> Either that, >> or have it as a completly orthogonal property that nevertheless >> interacts with TYPE, but I think that's overcomplicating matters. > > It is not clear to me whether you realize that that is what I suggested. > You said orthogonal, I said separate. Did you already know that?
Ah, well that in turn was what I suggested originally, so I assumed you were suggesting something different. I now see that you were just pointing out that set_package_properties() had already (sort of) solved the issue I foresaw (although that solution is actually equivalent to the idea for mitigating the issue that I previously suggested). Of course, the solution depends on people using set_package_properties() on all the packages they search for. So doing find_package(Foo) find_package(Bar) where Bar happens to also be a transitive dependency of Foo will cause Bar to be omitted from the feature summary unless you also do set_package_properties(Bar PROPERTIES TYPE OPTIONAL) or some such. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
