cordlandwehr added a comment.
License statements with mixed usage of LGPL and GPL were clarified on mailing list. INLINE COMMENTS > cgiboudeaux wrote in krcc.cpp:4 > Same thing here clarified here that the conversion was correct: LGPL-2.0-only OR LGPL-3.0-only OR LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL > cgiboudeaux wrote in krcc.h:4 > The original license doesn't make sense. > > If it's LGPL-2.0 or LGPL-3.0, the GPL 3 clause cannot be invoked > > This needs some code archeology to understand where the issue comes from license statement was clarified in this mail https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2020-February/103127.html to be LGPL-2.0-only OR LGPL-3.0-only OR LicenseRef-KDE-Accepted-LGPL REPOSITORY R243 KArchive REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D27104 To: cordlandwehr Cc: cgiboudeaux, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
