On Saturday 04 January 2014 19:18:56 Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, > > I cleanup the frameworks branch in kate.git to only have libktexteditor lib > and the KTextEditor/ktexteditor includes to be installed as public API. > > Now, for 5.x, if others port over, like KDevelop, is it a good idea to keep > the ktexteditor parts in kate.git, together with the applications, or shall > that be split again into a khtml like framework?
We want to make separate releases of the 3 major products: frameworks, apps and workspace. So libs that are used by workspace and apps, should be in frameworks. For libs that are only used by apps .... I guess they can either be in apps or in frameworks. So IMHO the question is: is there a chance the KDE workspace will need it? Of course the other question is: do you want to make it available as a framework for non-KDE developers to use in Qt applications? If the answer is yes to either of these questions, then you need to split it out into a framework. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
