El Diumenge, 8 de desembre de 2013, a les 10:16:36, Martin Graesslin va escriure: > Hi, > > at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically > wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite > some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use > xml gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell). > > My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework: > * kglobalaccel.cpp > * kglobalaccel.h > * kglobalaccel_p.h > * kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp > * kglobalshortcutinfo.h > * kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp > * kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h > * org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml > * org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml > > From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the > dependencies are: > * QtCore > * QtDBus > * QtWidgets > * QtX11Extras > > Opinions?
Not an oposition but... Is there no other tier1 framework where it would fit logically and dependency wise? Sometimes I have the fear we might be splitting a bit too much (which can result in nightmare for release and package people amonsght otther stuff). Cheers, Albert > > Cheers > Martin > > P.S. I blame Aurélien and his diagrams for this proposal. It made me look > into the dependencies of KWin and I had a "wtf why are we linking sonnet?" > moment and looked into what we used of XmlGui. _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
