On Sunday 24 November 2013 21:36:02 Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> Tiers above 1 are not especially relevant. A tier is a fluid label. It > >> doesn't matter when we are using split repos. > > > > If you could stop spreading that it'd be nice. It's not because you see no > > value in tier 2 and 3 distinction that this value doesn't exist. > > I think this is a misunderstanding. > > I wasn't referring to what you are referring to. I'm referring to the idea > that the tier of a framework can change through its lifetime if it gets > dependencies etc, and the fact that post-split, there won't be a 'tier N > folder' for code to be in. The tier will only exist in documentation.
Aaaaah OK! Apologies I totally misunderstood your point, sorry about that. I probably shouldn't reply to emails during three weeks of non stop work... who knew sprints and conferences over week-ends were that draining? :) Cheers. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
