> On Nov. 23, 2013, 5:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Have you talked to with the build.kde.org guys to see if we can get such a > > window manager running?
[12:21] <mgraesslin> bcooksley: fyi https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/ [12:22] <bcooksley> mgraesslin: oki, looks fine to me [12:22] <bcooksley> not the best from a coverage POV obviously [12:22] <bcooksley> but not much else we can do short of using a WM provided by another project [12:22] <bcooksley> (like if X itself had one) [12:23] <bcooksley> (adding support to get such a WM started wouldn't be much effort at all) [12:25] <mgraesslin> well maybe use something very simple which is netwm compliant [12:25] <svuorela> is twm netwm compliant ? [12:25] <mgraesslin> I don't think so [12:25] <mgraesslin> isn't twm requiring you to manually place the windows? [12:26] <svuorela> else flux/open/blackbox according to wikipedias - Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/#review44270 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 23, 2013, 12:18 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 23, 2013, 12:18 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks. > > > Repository: kdelibs > > > Description > ------- > > Fixes unit test failure in Jenkins due to no netwm-compliant window manager > running. > > > Diffs > ----- > > tier1/kwindowsystem/autotests/kwindowsystemx11test.cpp c9784b1 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114052/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Martin Gräßlin > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
