On Tuesday 27 August 2013 09:08:24 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Well, if it's so useful, why would it be an over-stretch to have it in Qt? > > Maybe it's just me, but I don't see d-ptr idiom as something ubiquitous in > C++/Qt world, as it is in KDE.
Heh? Every single class in Qt has a d ptr. > How many people write libs and care about ABI All of Qt itself, and all the libs based on Qt... > Maybe Thiago could chime in on whether Qt is a place for something like > this? Yeah, ask him (not sure he monitors this list). > > And yeah if this class is incompatible with private class hierarchies, > > that > > fact should be documented in big fat letters in the documentation. > > As I noted in my previous mail, it does support it now - it was one of the > frequent requests (requested 3 times :) ) - a simple constructor that can > receive a pointer to the private class as well as arguments for constructing > it. Ah, OK. Sorry, I missed that then. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
