On Friday 22 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Ottens wrote: > > On Friday 08 February 2013 22:36:22 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> Is it only me who would prefer CamelCase to alllowercase names ? > >> find_package(KConfig NO_MODULE) > > > > Probably makes sense yes, AFAIK the Qt5 modules are camel cased too, > > right? > > > > Also I'm wondering if that'd make sense to namespace them somehow, is > > something like KF5::KConfig possible? Is it something we want in the > > first place? > > When used in-tree, KConfig would be used, but when we install it, > KF5::KConfig would be used. See any Config.cmake file installed already. > We're already doing that.
That is, "KF5::KConfig" is the name of the target you use to link against using target_link_libraries(), not the name of the package used in find_package(). This is either find_package(KConfig NO_MODULE) or find_package(KF5 COMPONENT KConfig) Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
