On Sunday, 2013-02-17, David Faure wrote: > The thing is, it could be either a pure QStandardPaths equivalent, or for > more compatibility with kde4-config it would also still answer requests > for e.g. --path xdgdata-icon, even if internally that's just > GenericDataLocation + "/icons". > > In the first case we would call it something like qpaths and even put it > into Qt, while in the second case it could be called kf5-config. > > Well, maximing compatibility (= minimizing porting efforts for users) is > good, so let's go for kf5-config.
IMHO something like qpath sounds better. I don't think there is a lot of usage of those special paths and even if there is any script would have to be updated to the new executable name anyway. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
