Alexander Neundorf wrote:

> On Saturday 16 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> KDE CI System wrote:
>> > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_FPIE_SUPPORT
>> > -- Performing Test __KDE_HAVE_FPIE_SUPPORT - Success
>> 
>> I don't think this option makes sense either. By default, Qt requires
>> that PIE is used, and it sets Qt5_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE if it does
>> need to be used.
>> 
>> CMake already knows how to enable PIE using the POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE
>> property.
> 
> Ok, so should we unconditionally set CMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE to
> TRUE or only if Qt5_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE is TRUE ?

No. We're doing that currently, but we don't need to do that anymore when we 
use CMake 2.8.11, because then we can set 
INTERFACE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE to true on the Qt5::Core target. Then 
any targets linking to Qt5::Core have their POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE 
property set to true, and they use -fPIE.

> 
> This means everything else related to fPIE/fPIC can be removed, right ?

I think so, yes.

Thanks,

Steve.


_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to