On Sunday 16 September 2012 19:22:26 Chusslove Illich wrote: > > [: David Faure :] > > Anyhow, I recommend splitting "in place" (in kdecore), first, to have > > commits that do the splitting, separated from the commits that do the > > moving. I can even do the moving once you've done the API splitting :-) > > Well that's totally great. I was thinking of asking about doing it this way > exactly, but thought it would be disrespective of your time :)
Hi Chusslove, any progress? :-) I solved the kservice issue temporarily (with a few big nasty ifdefs), but I'm very soon going to hit the same issue with KIO, which I'd like to split out, because KIO has a strong dependency on i18n -- I'm not porting that to tr(), there's a lot of plural forms in kio/global.cpp for instance. I think the plan was "tr() for frameworks with very few and simple translations, i18n for heavy i18n usage", and KIO fits into the second category, it seems. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel