On Sunday 06 May 2012 01:14:19 Stephen Kelly wrote: > David Faure wrote: > > kcompletionwidgets would only contain KLineEdit+KComboBox, and the > > completion classes. That's really not much imho. > > If we put KLineEdit in its own framework, that would already be 4 public > classes (KLineEdit, KCompletionBase, KCompletion, KCompletionMatches). > > A more realistic kcompletionwidgets would additionally contain KComboBox, > KCompletionBox, KEditListWidget, KHistoryComboBox KTimeComboBox and > KDateComboBox.
I don't like the name much, though. The last 4 classes you listed above, have very little to do with completion. Someone looking for KTimeComboBox would never think of looking for it in "kcompletionwidgets". I would rather have kwidgets, and a separate tier4 lib for KDE-related stuff (e.g. I just found out that KDialog belongs there, because it's tied to the help system of KDE (help:/ urls which end up opening khelpcenter). I'm not aware of a cross-free-desktops and even less cross-platform solution for this. I guess "pure Qt" apps simply open up HTML pages?). -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by Nokia to work on KDE, incl. KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
