> On Gen. 29, 2016, 12:36 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > LGTM. > > > > And yes, it could definitely use a different version. Or use the same > > version as KDE Applications?
The documentation shows both versions: <releaseinfo>&kig; 1.0 (Applications 15.12)</releaseinfo> I was asking about the version of Kig itself, which is 1.0 since the first version part of 4.0 (!). See the history of config-kig.h.cmake. At least 1.1... If you want to update the release number of Kig, I will update the documentation as well (and bump to 16.04). - Luigi ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125421/#review91728 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Set. 27, 2015, 6:09 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125421/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Set. 27, 2015, 6:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation, KDE Edu and David Narváez. > > > Repository: kig > > > Description > ------- > > - update version data according the new release (doc and man); > - remove personal references for reviews and experiences; > - update the list of authors; > - remove installation+compilation instruction (as for new doc guideline); > - remove useless 'package' entity; > - update options in the man page. > > ---------- > Maybe time to bump the version of Kig from 1.0 to something else? (at least > 1.1!) > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/index.docbook ef3bde1 > doc/man-kig.1.docbook 91e8f62 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125421/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Compiles > > > Thanks, > > Luigi Toscano > >
_______________________________________________ kde-doc-english mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english
