The only problem I see with this particular naming convention is if there is an interim release which markedly affects the DTD in any way. It would then be necessary to clarify the numerical association of the new version with the new DTD.
If we can be certain there is not going to be an interim release, then I have no problem with this naming convention. Robert J. Grange --------------------------------------------- "Most gods throw dice, but Fate plays chess, and you don't find out til too late that he's been playing with two queens all along." On Feb 16, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to implement the support for multiple DocBook versions in kdoctools to allow a smoother migration from the current version (4.2-based) to the 4.5-based. In order to do that I probably need to leave the current DTD file (dtd/kdex.dtd) as it is, with the definition of 4.2-based DocBook XML DTD, and introduce a new file with the definition of the 4.5-based DocBook XML DTD (so that ported files will have to use the new DTD and the new filename - the change is in the same line). The question is: what name for this file? dtd/kdedbx4 to point out that this is about DocBook XML 4.x (so that in the future we could theoretically support also a dtd/kdedbx5 based on DocBookXML 5) ? Suggestions/concerns/ideas? Ciao -- Luigi _______________________________________________ kde-docbook mailing list kde-docbook at kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-docbook
