???????? Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:49:03 +0200, Burkhard L?ck <lueck at hube-lueck.de>:
> Am Montag, 1. Dezember 2014, 22:35:09 schrieben Sie: >> Hi Burkhard, >> >> I am considering adding some Kst documentation update tasks to this >> year's >> Google Code-In. I have just checked quickly the current state of the >> documentation generated from the old kst 1.X docbook files and I have >> the >> following impressions: 1) The contents are still mostly interesting and >> relevant but some parts need a substantial overhaul 2) All screenshots >> are >> desperately outdated >> 3) DocBook is not easy to work with, especially for newbies >> 4) With the tutorials I recently uploaded on youtube >> (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuYlIZjLCWsDS6d3ghVZWrA) and the old >> contents anybody with good English skills should be able to produce >> something decent >> >> Based on that I would propose to move the contents from DocBook to ODT >> so >> that anybody can edit them easily. But I am unsure whether this is the >> most >> efficient approach, if in the end everything has to be ported back to >> DocBook. >> >> I'd be interested by any experienced advice on how to go about it >> without >> scaring new contributors away. >> >> Thanks for any hint, >> >> Nicolas > Hi, If you are really concerned about cooperation it is better to use the platform which is tailored for cooperation, our wiki: https://userbase.kde.org/Writing_an_Application_Manual Moreover, the wiki manual can be translated. The only disadvantage it cannot be easily converted into offline docs but Qt-only applications cannot load DocBooks anyway. Just my 2 cents. Best regards, Yuri
