Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2011, um 10:44:28 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > > Am Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2011, um 20:43:03 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > >> Am Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2011, 17:15:19 schrieb Burkhard L?ck: > >> > Hi Daniel, > >> > > >> > am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2011, um 05:37:32 schrieb Daniel U. Thibault: > >> > > GnuPG4Win/Kleopatra prominently warns about creating a revocation > >> > > > >> > > certificate before uploading a key pair to a PGP server. But there > >> > >> is > >> > >> > > a) no option to do this offered by the wizard and, more importantly, > >> > >> b) > >> > >> > > absolutely no mention of how to do this in the help. The interface > >> > >> is > >> > >> > > of no help, giving absolutely no hint of how to do this. > >> > > > >> > > I eventually found guidance at > >> > > > >> > > http://www.emiic.net/reference/57-encrypting-email. Not obvious at > >> > > all. > >> > > >> > This is about KGpg, right? > >> > > >> > Your a) seems to be a claim about a missing feature/warning/bug in > >> > >> KGpg, > >> > >> > please report at bugs.kde.org product KGpg. > >> > > >> > Your b) could be solved adding some infos about a revocation > >> > >> certificate > >> > >> > to the KGpg Handbook? > >> > >> Yes, please file a wishlist for KGpg on b.k.o and I'll see to get this > >> done > >> for SC 4.8. There currently is no interface to create a revocation > >> certificate for an existing key. You are however asked if you want to > >> create one with a new key. > >> > >> I don't think complaining about a revocation certificate on every upload > >> is > >> a good idea. But maybe we could do this with a > >> dont-show-this-dialog-again > >> thing. Please file a seperate wishlist if you want this implemented and > >> provide some good arguments to convince me. > > > > KGpg has an action "Revoke Key" in the context menu, which opens the > > "Create > > Revocation Certificate" dialog. > > But the documentation does not mention revocation. > > > > Eike would you mind to add something about revocation to the handbook, we > > could ship the updated doc with 4.7.1. > > Ups, indeed. Since even I forgot about it how is anyone else supposed to > know? ;) Yes, I think I'll cook up some text for this. Suggestions > welcome. > Ping Eike
-- Burkhard L?ck
