Burkhard L?ck wrote: > cc'ing Michael Pyne, afaik he was the last touching the stylesheets > > Am Mittwoch, 24. August 2011, 23:17:44 schrieb T.C. Hollingsworth: >> Burkhard L?ck wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 1) today I notices that the margins for a glossary in a documentation are >>> wrong compared to the section pages. >>> A good example for that is KNode. View the glossary page and you'll see >>> what I mean. >>> So I played a bit with the attached kde-default.css to make it better. >>> To be honest I have no clue about css, but for me the glossary in knode >>> looks better with the attched kde-default.css. >>> To proof that yourself just copy kde-default.css to your >>> share/doc/HTML/en/common/kde-default.css and try it with the knode >>> glossary. >> >> Looks good to me. >> >>> 2) guiicon markup has no background like the other gui* tags, but should >>> afaik, patch in the attachment. >>> > What about this change for guiicon?
That's fine too. Sorry, I meant to roll those together. :-) >>> 3) from my pov the distance between the last line of text and the top of >>> the footer is too much, anybody knows how to make that smaller? >> >> Change padding-bottom under contentBody in kde-doc.css. 1em looks >> decent to me, whereas now it's at 8.9! >> > Tried with 1em, better for me. > Any other opinions? > >>> 4) does anybody know how to disable the tooltips (chapter/sect title) >>> popping up when the mouse pointer stays longer than a few seconds on the >>> page? >> >> Someone would have to tell meinproc not to set the "title" attribute of >> the<div> enclosing sections and chapters in the generated HTML. >> > Ah, thanks for the hint. > Has to be changed in xsl processing I guess? Yup. I'm pulling a clone of kdelibs.git as we speak. Looking at gitweb providing a patch to fix won't be too difficult. > But is it only me feeling annoyed by popping up tooltips with no valuable info > and often covering the text I want to read? Certainly not. I totally agree. > > Btw. there is a BR https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266664 > > Thanks. > -T.C.
