A Dijous, 10 de juny de 2010, Mark Shelby va escriure: > I've brought up this topic before, but was just browsing the kde forums and > so I'll ask it of this mailing list again: What is the main reason that kde > documentation cannot be formatted strictly for wiki and updated by users, > and available primarily via internet access? > > I've heard arguments of needing to have documentation for every release > version of kde, but frankly I think that is a pipe-dream. The documentation > is so out of date and incomplete for *any* release version that it would be > further impossible to include docs for all releases! > > Also what is the need to include and make available by default offline > documentation? Why can't the system admin (if one exists for whatever size > network) simply download a hard copy of the wiki text and distribute it to > users internally as the sysadmin and users deem necessary? > > Why is the kde team locked into the docbook format? Don't kde-doc members > think their time would be much better served in not having to be a > gate-keeper for document changes and additions? Don't kde-doc developers > realize that many kde users would be happy to contribute to documentation > efforts if it weren't purposefully so dificult to contribute? Why the > "gate-keeper" mentality?
The same reason we don't have our code in a wiki. > > Just curious. Seriously. Not a flame. Really? To not wanting to flame, your mail is seriously flame-like written. Albert > > -Mark Shelby
