Hi Shaun, On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:35 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > Not a lot of response, so I'm going to assume everybody > on these two lists just trust us on this.
I think that's a fair assessment. The only thing I'm concerned about is potential clashes between generically-named docs (e.g. if GNOME has a desktop-help/ directory but KDE also wants a desktop-help/ directory). Will this be left up to packagers to decide what to do? > We use index.page for Mallard and index.html for HTML, so why > don't we simplify this whole thing and always use index.docbook > for DocBook? We don't need to worry about compatibility with > GNOME's existing documents, because those are in a different > location and referenced with a different URI scheme. That seems reasonable. Will index.xml be supported too? Thanks, Phil -- Phil Bull https://launchpad.net/~philbull
