On Mittwoch, 10. April 2024 09:21:34 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:51 AM Ingo Klöcker <kloec...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Dienstag, 9. April 2024 23:26:32 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > ktrip - NEW > > > > > > * https://invent.kde.org/utilities/ktrip/-/pipelines/657661 > > > > > > * craft_android builds fail > > > > *sigh* Why does kirigami master depend on the not yet released ECM 6.1.0? > > Likely as Kirigami itself is a Framework - that being said, it seems a bit > weird for the version bumps to be pushed to Frameworks before the release > has been made public (because Craft cannot use them until they're public...)
I learned that this is the usual procedure for Frameworks. But it highlights why it's a bad idea for applications to depend on the master versions of Frameworks. > The real question I have though is why does KTrip depend on Frameworks > master instead of released Frameworks? > Depending on Frameworks master is something applications should avoid > unless it is absolutely necessary. Exactly. ktrip needs a fix that's not in KF 6.0. Instead of adding a patch to Craft I told Craft to use Kirigami master. I shouldn't have done this. Lesson learned. Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
