El dimecres, 23 de setembre de 2020, a les 19:35:26 CEST, Andreas Cord-Landwehr va escriure: > On Montag, 21. September 2020 22:32:37 CEST Matthieu Gallien wrote: > > Is there some consensus as to what is best for code hosted by the KDE > > community ? > > Hi, that is a good question! I cannot recall that we discussed this during > the > last decade. Anyways, there is not a documented consensus either in the > licensing policy or in the licensing wiki. The REUSE project just says in > their FAQ [1] that there are several options. But I think it would be good to > have a preferred way. > Until today, I mostly saw the approach "author updated year on latest > change", > but I also know KDE projects where mass-copyright updates were done in the > past. > > Personally, I would prefer the way Johan described: Update the year only on > change. But that is only my opinion. What do the others think?
If you're not doing any change you're not creating copyright because there's nothing being created, so yes i would not agree on updating the copyright if you don't change anything. Also remember that you don't *need* to really write that you have copyright on things, you create copyright by just creating the things, the copyright notices are a nicety not really a requirement if you have other things like git that can prove who and when something was created [*] Cheers, Albert * Not a lawyer, not sure how valid a git commit log is to prove you created something in court > > Cheers, > Andreas > > > [1] https://reuse.software/faq/#years-copyright > > >
