> There's one comment about constructor initialisers, which seems resolvable.
If that solvable, then it's great. I'm in favour of this idea, maybe even extend to frameworks repos? > So if there's anything else, then yes, please be more specific. No, so far that was the only problem we've found. If we find something else, we'll come back with more specifics ;) Apparently it needs more testing on larger code base.
