On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:22 AM Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote:
>
> El dimarts, 4 de desembre de 2018, a les 18:10:44 CET, Thiago Macieira va 
> escriure:
> > On Monday, 3 December 2018 01:30:25 PST René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > > Can't you just configure the CI to use Qt 5.10? I think it's not good to
> > > hardcode an "overzealous" (for lack of a better word) Qt version in
> > > projects that don't require them AND I think that one should support the
> > > current LTS release in as many projects as possible as a general rule of
> > > principle.
> > >
> > > There's a reason why those LTS releases exist and that should probably be
> > > taken into consideration ESPECIALLY for the KF5 Frameworks (remember why
> > > kdelibs4 was split up)!
> >
> > Which is exactly why 5.11.3 (released today) should be picked. It contains 
> > all
> > fixes that 5.9.7 contains, whereas 5.10.1 does not. Moving from 5.9.7 to
> > 5.10.1 means regressing all those fixes.
>
> It doesn't matter, apps need 5.10 to compile, so CI needs to use 5.10.
>
> Of course users should be using 5.11.3, but that's a different story.

So you'd prefer we move to Qt 5.10 then, and then do another move to
5.11 when Frameworks moves it's bar up?

>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
>

Regards,
Ben

Reply via email to