El dimarts, 20 de desembre de 2016, a les 10:40:44 CET, Christian Ehrlicher va escriure: > Am 16.12.2016 um 11:32 schrieb Kevin Funk: > > If the SVN kioslave is standalone, wouldn't it make more sense to actually > > keep it in a separate repository/package? So users who just want the > > Dolphin integration can just use that? > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to move your kioslave implementation into > > kdesdk- kioslaves, replacing the older copy? > > > > I'm not sure whether Albert just wants to kill the repository or he's just > > phasing old unmaintained software. In case of the latter, updating the > > copy > > with the better maintained version probably makes more sense. > > I took a look into kdesdk-kioslaves - the code for svn there is > completely different from kdesvn kioslave. Therefore I would suggest to > remove kdesdk-kioslaves/svn because I won't maintain two different > implementations for one protocol. > A distro packager can separate the kdesvn kioslave into a separate > package, at least this is what I would expect looking at the kdesvn code.
Since noone really complained I went ahead and removed the svn kioslave from kdesdk-kioslaves, the kdesvn kioslave seems to work for the lightweight svn browsing i'd expect people to use a kioslave for. Cheers, Albert > > > Christian
