On Fri, April 22, 2016 01:04:42 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 21 d’abril de 2016, a les 15:04:57 CEST, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: > > >>> Also, another -1 from me is because I don't think we should use GitHub > > >>> more than a mere mirror. > > >> > > >> It would still remain a mere mirror imho, i.e. strictly read-only. Btw > > >> do > > >> we have some written rule about our github presence somewhere? It seems > > >> to me that some KDE project uses github as their main development > > >> platform.> > > > > > > Urls to those projects which "appear" to be using Github as their > > > primary development platform would be appreciated. > > > > I most certainly *always* link to code on github and to the documentation. > > > > > Use of Github for anything other than mirror purposes, especially if > > > it is being pushed as the primary means of making contributions is > > > strictly prohibited under the Manifesto. > > > > Except it isn't. Please point me to where it does. > > I guess it depends of what you understand with "primary means of making > contributions", if it's "pushing the code there first and then merging to > kde repos" I think there's quite a few reasons against it in the Manifesto.
I mean, didn't we have like 3-4 huge threads about this very issue not that long ago? I too thought that the conclusion was that Github was OK as a mirror but not for use as any part of the actual development workflow (e.g. bug tracking, CI, pull requests, etc.). Regards, - Michael Pyne
