On Saturday, January 16, 2016 6:41:21 PM CET Juan Carlos Torres wrote: [...] > That said, I'm not 100% sure about the accuracy of my ported code, so more > eyes are much appreciated. The KIO part (saving and loading files) was > particularly tricky as there wasn't a 1:1 equivalent. And KIO and Jobs are > still alien to me. The original tutorial also didn't seem to actually save > to remote paths, only load from them. Likewise, I didn't either. Feature > parity!
Hey Juan, great work! Regarding getting a better overview of what is already ported/updated for KF5/Qt5 and what is left to be reviewed (i.e. to be checked for remaining porting problems), what do you think about creating a Phabricator project that can be used to track the progress of all techbase tutorial? Having that to coordinate the effort, I think it will be easier for others to just pick a tutorial for update/reviewing. A second thought on a different minor: I would not use a warning to say that at tutorial is aimed for KF5/Qt5 instead of KDE4, but a rather neutral info box. Maybe we can even create a small macro to provide such version relationships, which then gives such information in a more uniform look. Cheers, Andreas >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
