El Dijous, 9 de juliol de 2015, a les 00:05:04, Ralf Habacker va escriure: > Am 05.07.2015 um 13:25 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > El Diumenge, 5 de juliol de 2015, a les 13:10:50, Ralf Habacker va escriure: > >> Am 05.07.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > >>> El Diumenge, 5 de juliol de 2015, a les 12:03:35, Ralf Habacker va > > > > escriure: > >>>> Am 18.05.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > >>>>> My suggestion for you if you really want to maintain a longer term > >>>>> kdelibs4- based version of umbrello s to keep doing commits in your > >>>>> "last" kdelibs4- branch (i guess Applications/15.04 in this case), > >>>>> though > >>>>> since we're not doing any more tarballs of those i'm not sure it will > >>>>> reach many people, you'll have to ping distro people and tell them to > >>>>> look into the branch regularly for bugfixes or you can try releasing > >>>>> your > >>>>> own tarballs. > >>>> > >>>> According to the available number of distributions > >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_distributions#Official_dist > >>>> ri > >>>> but ions you are aware that this will require noticable efforts to > >>>> perform for every release ? > >>> > >>> I am, but given that you want to release two versions of the same app > >>> and > >>> we don't support that is the best I could suggest. > >> > >> You are also aware, that Windows and Mac OSX installation support is > >> currently broken (KF5 applications could not find distributed data > >> files, see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-44473) and requires to > >> stay for that platforms with KDE4, while KF5 is usable for unix like os ? > > > > I am not, but what does this have to do with what we are discussing? > > Until the mentioned issues are not fixed umbrello master needs to stay > with KDE4 to not break windows and mac osx releases.
You could do windows and mac osx releases from a non-master branch and KF5 releases in master for linux if you wanted, no? This in case the KF5 version is quality-ready (which i do not know if is or not). Just had a look at the code and I have the impressiong that having two clean separate codebases would personally make me happier than all those #if QT_VERSION you have around? > That means also further release branches will be KDE4 based for unknown > time, but also no KF5 based releases for unknown time. Having master based in kdelibs4 is fine (we'll need to have the talk when to stop supporting that, but that's a different story). What is not a good idea is having a master where kdelibs4 and KF5 can be built from, that is bound to break at some point and cause issues with various of the toolings we have. Cheers, Albert > > Cheers > Ralf > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe > >> << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
