On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi < percy.camilo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Jeremy Whiting <jpwhit...@kde.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Aleix, All, >>> >>> In looking at what needs to be done to prepare libkdeedu for porting >>> to kf5 and qt5 and what needs doing to split (or maybe just repurpose >>> it as libkeduvocdocument + data ?) as per >>> http://community.kde.org/KDEEdu/RouteToKF5 I took a look at the icons >>> folder. >>> >>> The users of the icons there are mostly kmplot, but also analitza. My >>> question is where should these icons go? Can/should we move them into >>> some general purpose icons repository (kde-artwork or something?) or >>> should they move into analitza git repo (only if kmplot depends on >>> analitza already I think). Or somewhere else entirely? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeremy >>> >> >> Hi, >> kmplot doesn't use analitza and never will, what we are proposing is >> khipu, a new project, as a replacement. >> >> That said, I'd say the best could be to get a kde-math-icons repository >> or similar? Is there another case of a repository with only icons? Maybe >> oxygen? (even though the icons are not oxygen per se...) >> Anybody has an opinion? >> >> Aleix >> >> PS: Adding kde-devel because I can see this happening on other modules as >> well and I think we want a way do decide these things. >> >> > We could move those artifacts into something like libkdeedu-math-data or > as Aleix said: kde-math-icons. In any case, I think a dedicated repository > for this kind of content (related with kde math applications) is a good > idea. > > Percy > > It still sounds quite weird that we have a repo for all artwork in KDE except for some and then one with the mathematical icons as if they were something that special. Aleix
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
